I am left with more questions than answers...
Who started the process
Did City Council Know
Did City staff know
Why did pinchin make those comments
housing providers or landlords what is their role and the role of the Board?
Who instructed the one contractor to do the work Christmas Eve and only do a small part of it...who is now sitting in jail for murder..knew something was not right about him....
Why did they refuse to deal with several complaints made by female tenants about one of the male contractors
Why did the admin lie...
Why mislead the board is the board aware of the truth more inclined to believe they condone these actions..
what is the city`s role in all this....
libel libel libel
legal redress
is the only options left...
1 comment:
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_26-3-2005_pg3_3
We believe the court system should be as open and transparent as possible," says editor in chief Lois Tuffin. "If a person interested in a case cannot make it to a hearing, then the records should be available to keep them abreast of what is happening. The press aims to be the eyes and ears of the public in these cases, but there are restrictions that make it difficult for us to cover cases fairly."
In September, the courthouse staff started drawing black lines through sexual assault cases, citing a Ministry of the Attorney-General policy. This Week argued more cases were blacked out than necessary and pushed the case with help from staff from MPP Jeff Leal's office.
Const. Berge made no note of the seatbelt until he stopped the car and looked around," she said. "This contradicted what he said at the preliminary (hearing)."
Neither the drugs nor the gun would have been found without the unlawful questioning of Safadi, Smith said. That action tainted all the evidence in the case, she said, before staying all charges against Safadi.
While everyone has a moral responsibility to assist the police, there is no legal obligation, Smith said Friday. Berge's questioning -- before reading Safadi his rights -- effectively forced the man to incriminate himself, she told the court.
"Mr. Safadi had a higher right to privacy as to the contents of his mouth," she said.
"The accused had a privacy right to things secured on or in his person."
The incident comes days after the federal government announced $2.2 million dollars to help police departments across the country grapple with issues surrounding racial profiling and bias in policing.
The Edmonton Police Service is not part of that federal partnership.
"Our legal advisers will need to take a look at the ruling before we can offer up any comment," Andy Weiler, an Edmonton police spokesman, said Friday.
Post a Comment